Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation
Skip to user menu
Skip to search
Accessibility
Neuroimaging Resources Registry
Neuroimaging Data Repository
Cloud Computing Environment
Member login
|
Register
|
Help
Toggle navigation
Find
By Attribute
By Popularity
By Performance
Participate
Community
Register New Tool or Resource
Community Forums
Recently Active Forums
Calendar of Events
Support
Contact Us
User Help
About NITRC
What is NITRC?
NITRC TEAM
Dataset Acceptance Policy
Our Users
Technical Information
Cite Us
Member login
|
Register
|
Help
search
Search within this tool/resource
This tool/resource's releases
This tool/resource's news
Related Web Pages
Related Web Pages Matrix View
Tools/Resources
People
NIF
for
Advanced Search
This repository is under review for potential modification in compliance with Administration directives.
Browse Tool Details
Summary
Support
Advanced Search
Docs
Downloads
Images
Mailing Lists
News
PubMed Mentions
Wiki
Forum
Ratings & Reviews
User Reviews
( 6 )
Overall:
Installation:
Documentation:
Individual Rating Results for XNAT
Review 6 of XNAT on Jun 26, 2012
Version Reviewed:
1.5
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:
Download/Installation Ease:
Documentation/Support Quality:
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:
Fills a niche that is not filled by anything else and would take longer to roll your own vs use what's provided. Future development plan looks like the project owners understand the limitations and want to fix them.
Review 5 of XNAT on Jun 26, 2012
Version Reviewed:
1.5
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:
Download/Installation Ease:
Documentation/Support Quality:
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:
We are currently using xnat to support the image acquisition and analysis of all our imaging project. Xnat provides a stable infrastructure and its extensibility enables it to grow with our imaging and subject data collection need.
Review 4 of XNAT on Jun 26, 2012
Version Reviewed:
1.5.4
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:
Download/Installation Ease:
Documentation/Support Quality:
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:
Documentation is lacking in the more detailed areas. However, I see it improving.
Review 3 of XNAT on Dec 20, 2011
Version Reviewed:
1.5.3
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:
Download/Installation Ease:
Documentation/Support Quality:
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:
Difficult to install, setup, and diagnose. Documentation is quite comprehensive, but some crucial details aren't clear, and that can break things in subtle ways. On the other hand, this is apparently still the only available solution that does what it does, it is used by some big projects, and in that sense it should at least be a fairly safe bet in terms of long-term prospects.
Review 2 of XNAT on Jun 20, 2009
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:
Download/Installation Ease:
Documentation/Support Quality:
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:
Thanks to the great folks at Wash U and my hiring a full time IT savvy informatics person, we now have XNAT installed and are customizing it for our use. I am very enthusiastic about the powerful capabilities of this software to improve my management of my own lab data and even more enthusiastic about how it will help my multi-site imaging studies.
Review 1 of XNAT on Dec 04, 2008
Overall Ease vs. Functionality:
Download/Installation Ease:
Documentation/Support Quality:
Ratings/Long-term Prospects Comments:
Overall -- difficult to install, but they're working on it. great functionallity, once you get it working Installation -- This is difficult, but they're working on it. Many steps, requires root access, and a large number of dependencies. Documentation -- sparce Long-term -- This is a vary valuable tool, once the installation difficulties get worked out.
Other Comments/Similar Tools:
Similar Tool/Resource -- HID